ebook Review: Speed Dating With the Dead

A paranormal conference at the most haunted hotel in the Southern Appalachian mountains . . .

A man’s promise to his late wife that he’d summon her spirit . . .

A daughter whose imagination goes to dark places . . .

And demonic evil lurking in the remote hotel’s basement, just waiting to be awoken.

When Digger Wilson brings his paranormal team Spirit Seekers International to the White Horse Inn, he is skeptical that his dead wife will keep her half of the bargain. He doesn’t believe in ghosts. But when one of the conference guests channels a mysterious presence and an Ouija board spells out a pet phrase known only to Digger and his wife, his convictions are challenged.

And when guests start to disappear, Digger and his daughter Kendra must face the circle of demons that view the hotel as their personal playground. Because soon the inn will be closing for good, angels can’t be trusted, and demons don’t like to play alone . . .

Speed Dating with the Dead by Scott Nicholson is the first ebook I have ever been sent a free copy of specifically to review. That’s kind of cool. Makes me feel like a real book blogger.

I’ve mentioned before that I’m a speculative fiction reader, mostly fantasy, some science fiction and I also enjoy a good supernatural horror. Sadly for me the horror shelves these days are full of paranormal romance and gross out mundane serial killer type horrors – neither of which float my boat.

The author described his novels as paranormal thrillers in his pitch email. That on its own was enough to pique my interest. A paranormal thriller in my mind is one of two things, a supernatural horror or a more standard thriller with paranormal elements (often only a stone’s throw from horror) and I like them both as long as they don’t go past my personal squick barrier.

Once I’d read the blurbs on his work I was sure I was dealing with horror and selected Speed Dating to review because the blurb and cover enticed me most.

So now on with the review proper.

Speed Dating with the Dead is a solid and enjoyable piece of writing, yet I find myself in two minds about it. I enjoyed it, yet at the same time I felt that it could have been more than it is.

The premise is a good one. Demons versus Paranormal Investigators in a remote hotel. It’s a classic. Some people might call it cliche, but things become cliches for because they work and it’s handled well enough to not just be a rerun of the same old plot even when it is.

The two main characters (Digger and Kendra) are interesting. So rarely are Paranormal Investigators in Horror sceptics, so it’s nice to see one who is totally skeptical. The other characters are less well developed but not direly so. The Demons are pretty much the faceless monstrous evil type – very little depth here. They may have motives beyond having very nasty fun but they aren’t entirely clear to me. This type of horror is one of the few places I don’t mind such a thing.

Whenever the demons turn up any scene they are in gets tense and exciting very quickly. However some of the other scenes, especially in the early part of the book were less interesting, especially when the info-dumping started. Info-dumps can be an unfortunate necessity in any form of Speculative Fiction but I found them a little intrusive on the reading experience here.

Another thing was that while each of the subplots was individually good with a few being brilliant they didn’t have enough points of intersection for my taste. Even though several of them did intesect in the excellent climax it felt almost like a series of short stories following different characters in the same place and time rather than subplots of a novel. This isn’t a major problem but it did make the story a little disjointed at time.

Verdict: I’m very aware that in trying to articulate why I felt Speed Dating with the Dead could be better I might have given the impression that I disliked it. To be clear I did like it and I think other readers of supernatural horror would quite possibly like it as well. I like it well enough that I’m going to buy a copy from Smashwords because I feel having enjoyed it for free Scott Nicholson deserves to be paid for his stuff (well that and the fact I can’t seem to work out how to view pdfs in my phone).

Speed Dating with the Dead is available for the Kindle or at Smashwords for $2.99.

Scott Nicholson can be found online at Haunted Computer Books.

Posted in ebook reviews | Leave a comment

Guest Post: Gabriel Gadfly on Offline Promotion for Weblit

Photo of Gabriel GadflyGabriel Gadfly is a 24 year old Weblit poet and blogger from Alabama who thinks he’s a decent writer and thinks you should too. He writes a little bit of everything, but mostly fantasy fiction and weird love poems about zombies.

He’s provided this excellent post about offline promotion for weblit authors.

Visit Gabriel at his Website or find him on Twitter.


How Public Readings Can Help Weblit Writers Gain Readers
by Gabriel Gadfly

When most weblit writers think of ways to promote their sites, offline efforts often get overlooked. After all – we write for the Web, we publish our work on the Web, our readers read us on the Web, so it makes sense to focus on promotional efforts that directly involve the Web: ad campaigns, social media, backlinks generated through forum posts, blog comments, and reviews, etc.. That said, I’d like to focus for a bit on one method of offline promotion that can not only help you attract readers, but maybe even generate some sales.

I’m talking about The Reading. It’s an event that’s long been a staple of the literary world: an author publishes a book and travels around a bit, reading an excerpt of their work to a public audience at venues like coffee shops, book stores, universities, and libraries. Depending on the venue’s budget, sometimes refreshments are made available, and there’s usually a bit of time afterward to personally talk with the author, purchase signed copies of their book, or ask questions.

If you think about it, the reading has a lot in common with weblit: the author is delivering their content straight to the audience, the audience has the ability to ask questions or make comments directly to the author, and, on the business side, the audience is able to purchase books direct from the author without the impersonal intermediary of a bookstore or Amazon.com checkout screen.

In an article in this month’s Poets & Writers magazine, author Steve Almond writers “What I’d noticed over the years was that I sold most of my books at readings. For those of us authors in the vast midlist ghetto, this is generally true. It’s not reviews or blurbs or fancy Web sites that generate sales, but the opportunity to read our work for an audience of strangers as often as possible.” (“Self-Publishing Steve,” Poets & Writers, July/August 2010).

Almond brings up a lot of good points in the article, but one in particular mentions the effect an author’s presence has on a reader’s decision to buy a book: because buying a book directly from the author’s hand is so much more of a personal and novel experience than purchasing books the traditional way, it tends to lead to higher sales. In other words, people who wouldn’t normally buy your work are more likely to do so when you’re pitching it directly to them.

Of course, the conundrum is this: how does a (traditionally) unpublished writer get invited to give a reading? Some venues only host readings by invitation – this is especially common in universities – and without some particular notoriety or personal connection with the event coordinator, it can be tough to land that sort of invitation. Other venues, however, are more open to pitches from authors: coffee shops, small libraries, and independent bookstores are often looking for events to draw people in the door. Contact the owner or the person in charge of coordinating events for the venue and tell them you’d like to host a reading at their place. If they’re not familiar with weblit publishing, tell them a bit about it and invite them to check out your work. With a professional, confident demeanor, a thick skin for rejections, and a bit of luck, you might be able to land a few gigs.

Even if you can’t land a traditional reading, look for alternative events where you can put your work in front of an audience: open mic nights are great for poetry or flash fiction, and if your work is notable to a niche group, look for local organizations related to that niche – for example, if you write a steampunk serial, look for local steampunk groups and see if any of them are interested in letting you give a reading at their next meeting. If you write a story about superheroes, a local comic book shop might be worth checking out.

About once a month, the local coffee shop hosts a poetry slam competition, and I’ve participated several times. Every time, I’ve had members of the audience come up to talk to me and ask where they can find more of my work. About half of the new readers I gained this way have become regular readers of my work that return every time I post something new – you won’t find that kind of conversion rate in most forms of online promotion.

You don’t necessarily have to have a dead-tree book to sell at your readings, but it does help if you have something tangible: give out bookmarks with your URL, or have a sign-up list for a newsletter where people can get updates about your new content. If you have any ebooks available, consider giving out discount codes to people who attend the reading. Since I usually have my laptop with me at poetry slams, I’ve been known to pull up the site and let people fill out the Subscribe By Email form right there.

If you’re going to give a reading, be sure to advertise it! Post about it on your site, your Twitter account, on Facebook page. Depending on your budget, it might even be a good idea to print up some flyers advertising the event. Afterwards, post a recap and maybe even some pictures or video. Video of the event lets your reading work double duty: not only do you get the offline promotion, but you’ve got a strong piece of content that you can post on YouTube to maybe generate some online traffic as well, and it’s a good way to people who couldn’t make it to the event to still catch your reading.

What about you? What are your experiences with readings?

Posted in Guest Post | 2 Comments

Weblit Review: Castle Terribel

Mansemat Cthonique. Dark Lord of the Plains of Dread. Master of the Castle Terribel. Doting Husband, Father, and Stepfather.
For centuries, the Lands of Night and Light have been locked in a struggle of light against darkness.

This is about life in the Land of Night, a place where even Dark Lords have hobbies.

Oh my! Castle Terribel by John Ball is very, very silly – and I mean that in a good way. This is comic fantasy to the nth degree but balanced by hints of seriousness and a definite plot.

Likes:

  1. The  characters are wonderful. I especially like Nisrioch Cthonique.
  2. Every single part so far has made me laugh at least once – usually more.
  3. In spite of the rampant silliness a plot is emerging and there are hints of trouble ahead. A delicate balancing act which is working so far.

Dislikes:

  1. The white text on a black background may be thematically appropriate for a story about a dark lord, but it’s hard on the eyes.
  2. Very occassionally, especially early on, the silliness is a little overdone. This has calmed down as the story progresses however.

Verdict:

Extremely silly in a good way. If you like comedic fantasy you’ll probably like this. Just don’t read it while eating or drinking, or you’ll end up having to clean your screen.

Posted in weblit reviews | Leave a comment

Guest Post: G.L. Drummond on ebook pricing

Cover Image for Dark CravingsThis week’s Guest Post is by G.L. Drummond – an Indie Author/Self-Publisher who is active in both the weblit and ebook communities.

She’s been experimenting with the pricing of  her ebooks for  sometime and is sharing the benefit of her experiences with us today.

How to Price Your Ebooks

If there is a secret formula for pricing your ebooks so that they sell like hotcakes, many of us have yet to discover it.

Some Indies opt for 99 cents or at least under $2, hoping to entice readers in with those super low prices in order to build their brand and author platform. In other words, to get their stories in front of eyeballs belonging to readers who will remember their names.

Others refuse to price that low, either feeling that it proves they devalue their own work, or in fear that readers won’t take a chance due to believing the low price denotes horribly bad writing.

Yet, either option might be the right choice for you.

I’ve done both.  My results? Eighty-five percent of my sales have come from titles priced $3.25 to $5.25, while only fifteen percent have come from titles priced $2.99 or less. When Amazon or whichever site decides to discount my ebooks, my sales usually dry up.

So I’ve decided anything under $3.25 doesn’t work for my ebooks.

Basically, what it comes down to is a willingness to experiment with pricing until you find the right price that your Ebook(s) sell consistently at.

You can start low, with 99 cents, then gradually raise the price. Or start high and gradually lower it. Eventually, you’re going to hit that magical right price that will entice readers to purchase your ebooks.

Don’t change prices daily. Give each a couple of weeks to a month to see how that particular price does. Ebook pricing is a total guessing game!

Offering yours at 99 cents doesn’t guarantee you’ll see sales like J.A. Konrath or Zoe Winters does. In fact, you might not sell a single copy – and then have five sales when you raise the price to $2.99 or more.

Be reasonable about your pricing. If it’s a 7500 word novelette, don’t price it at $12.99 or anything ridiculous like that.

After all, would you prefer 3 sales at $12.99, or 100 sales at $3.25?

G.L. Drummond is an Indie Author/Self-Publisher who is active in both the weblit and ebook communities.

According to Miladysa on Twitter she’s “gun-toting alien with a fetish for fur and four-legged creatures who writes fiction & tweets.”

Visit her on the web at Feral Intensity or find her on Twitter.  Her ebook releases are available from various outlets including Smashwords and the Amazon Kindle Store.

Posted in Guest Post | Leave a comment

A little bit of self-congratulation and the hunt for a better title

As I’m sure most of you know I have my own weblit serial “Dragon Wars”. I woke up this morning to discover a new review at the Web Fiction Guide. Fiona has been a regular reader and commenter for some time, so I know she liked it. But it was still a pleasant surprise.

At the end of the overwhelmingly positive review she says this:

The author has mentioned that her title DRAGON WARS is “boring”; and I agree it doesn’t really do the story justice; besides this, it’s the name of a computer RPG that is nothing to do with this story. Reader contest for new title, maybe?

And she’s right on all counts. People read my story in spite of the title not because of it, I know that, and who knows how many potential readers it loses me.

But I suck at thinking up titles. I have titles for most of the planned arcs (including a rename for the first arc once it’s done), but when it comes to overarching series title I’m drawing a blank. About the best entry on my brainstorming page is “Talonyka’s Stars” which is at least unique and pretty fitting. But it doesn’t feel right and it sounds like a talent show.

So perhaps the idea of a reader contest has some merit. I’m just not sure what I could offer as a  prize.

On the downside I’d  need to get new ads designed,  but I guess that’s  a minor issue.

Thoughts and suggestions welcome.

Posted in Brainstorming | 16 Comments

Weblit Review: The Aphorisms of Kherishdar

For the Ai-Naidar, a species of slim, gracile aliens, caste and tradition are not the shackles that imprison the spirit but the silences that make sense of the music of their lives. The Aphorisms of Kherishdar collects 25 short tales about what it is to have an Ai-Naidari soul: to find comfort in tradition, law and structure; to revere interdependence over individualism; to know one’s place . . . to always have one.

The Aphorisms of Kherishdar by M.C.A. Hogarth are beautiful. There really is no other word for it. These 25 short little flash fiction pieces reveal the heart and soul of a richly created alien culture.

It’s hard to create a truly alien culture and make it believable but The Aphorisms succeed admirably. Short they may be but each of these stories needs savoring to really appreciate them. So few words, so much richness. The Ai-Naidar are very different from humanity, but in their  differences they reveal much about us.

This is really quite a hard  review for me to write. The Aphorisms of Kherishdar are so good I’m having a hard time conceiving of better. I have an  informal rule that I never  give anyything 5 stars, because nothing is perfect.

But with these stories I’m breaking that rule. I’m sure they aren’t perfect, but they’re close enough for me.

Posted in weblit reviews | 1 Comment

ebook Review: Claws 2

Cover Image Claws 2

Down on her luck and bankrupt, embattled wildlife biologist Dr. Angie Rippard accepts a long-shot assignment from the governor of Colorado to determine once and for all if grizzly bears are completely extinct in the southwest corner of the state.
No one has seen a grizzly north of Durango since 1979, but the governor needs proof to halt development of a 6,000-acre ski resort that will devastate the natural resources of the region.

What Angie finds will forever disrupt construction of the 500-million-dollar resort, and pits her against powerful political forces that will stop at nothing to see that her research never sees the light of day… even if it means hunting her to her death through the worst snowstorm ever seen in the mountains near Telluride.

You probably remember Stacey Cochran’s Guest Post from  a few weeks back. You may even remember my review of the first Claws Novel from the old blog.

So first things first thanks to Kindle for PC I actually got  to buy the book myself this time.

Anyway on with the review.

Like its predecessor Claws 2 is not a book I’d normally buy, but since I enjoyed the first book I took the plunge for the second. And again like the first  book it was broadly enjoyable.

Stacey’s  writing  seems to improve book by book. There are several scenes  which are so beautifully tense they’re mouthwatering  and there are far fewer laggy bits than in the first book. The characters seem far more rounded. They’re still not paragons of depth – this is a thriller after all – but the primary antagonist is much more credible than in Claws 2. Some of the secondary characters are still rather underdeveloped but it’s definitely better.

There are two main story threads.  The first is a Grizzly Bear on the rampage in an area where they are supposed to be extinct. The second is a the employees of the developer who wants to hide the fact the Grizzly exists, because it would ruin their plans and their ruthless actions to ensure this. So far so good but, for me at least, they don’t gel perfectly. Whereas in Claws the Mountain Lion felt truly integrated to the plot the grizzly feels more like a plot device than the main event in some way I can’t explain.

Having said that there’s a wealth of regional knowledge and painstaking research gone into this novel that  is really  evocative. The setting is breathtakingly realised as a result.

Verdict: In general Claws 2 reads better and faster than Claws did, and it holds the attention better (which is saying something). However this and the improvement in characterisation are balanced by a slightly weaker plot making it over all approximately the same level in my mind.

If you enjoyed Claws or if you like enviromental/animal thrillers in general then Claws 2 will definately appeal  to you.

Claws 2 is solely available on the Amazon Kindle Store.

Posted in ebook reviews | Leave a comment

Guest Post: Sharon T Rose on Writing

Thumbshot of LilyfieldsThis Week’s Guest Post is by Weblit Author Sharon T. Rose. She describes  herself as an author, dreamer, and doer of the impossible!

Her current projects include “Space and Time” and “Swords and Sigils“.

Sharon has written a post about being a writer.

Over to  you Sharon.

So, you want to be a writer, hmm?

You think you have what it takes?  Do ya?

Great!  There’s lots of us who feel the same way, so when I say, “Join the club,” I mean it!  We welcome all comers, no matter your genre, background, or publishing creds.

In fact, there are a lot of us who write simply because we enjoy it, enjoy sharing our stories with people.  Some of us want to be published by the Big Six; some of us are aiming at self-pub or local imprints.  Some of us just do this as a hobby and don’t care if we achieve international acclaim.  You’ll find all types here, from fantasy to modern to horror to sci-fi to comedy to tragedy.  We’re a mixed bag, we modern-day authors.  We write novels and serials and screenplays and comics and just about anything else we can come up with.

When I first began thinking about writing, my thoughts were along the line of, “Yeah, right.”  Writing wasn’t “real” work, wasn’t a real job.  It wasn’t something that serious people did.  It was alright for other people to be writers, but not for me.  I was destined for a white-collar career doing something Important.

Where I got these stupid ideas, I’ve no idea.  Anyone can be a writer!  Writing is “real” work, and more importantly, it’s hard work.  Just as hard as anything you can do in Corporate World.  It takes effort and determination and perspiration.

Frankly, that kind of intimidated me, too.  I read a lot of books, some of which were mind-bendingly awesome.  I thought, “How could I ever hope to do this?  I could never be that good!”

Eventually I realized that those fabulous authors were, at one point in their lives, not that good, either.  Yes, some people are naturally better at crafting stories, using words, shaping phrases, and leaving the audience wanting more.  But every single one of them had to take that talent and shape it into skill.  Remember the old story about the servant who buried his gold instead of investing it?  If you don’t use your talents, you lose them, no matter how good you were to start with.

To that end, I’m going to share with you some tips and tricks I’ve picked up over the years.  Hah; that makes it sound like I’ve been writing forever and am so experienced and stuff and junk.  Pfft.  Odds are that I’m a lot like you: someone who has the desire and carved out a little time here and there, someone who decided to take the chance and make it work.

The first and most important task for any writer is KNOW THE RULES OF GRAMMAR.  I cannot stress this enough.  If you cannot write correctly, then you cannot write well.  Get a basic grammar book, take some extra classes, do whatever it takes to have the rules of grammar firmly burned into your brain.  This is a base-level skill that you should have learned before you got out of elementary school (or its equivalent).  If you didn’t, shame on your educational system and to the bookstore with you.  You shouldn’t have to think twice about where commas go or when to use a participial phrase.

“But you don’t always use grammar the right way!” you cry.  You’re right; I don’t.  My most flagrant disregard is in splitting infinitives with negatives: “to not fall.”  I do it on purpose and with full knowledge of what I’m doing.  You see, I’ve studied grammar and I make sure I know when and why I’m breaking the rules.  That’s what higher-level knowledge enables you to do: bend or break rules when appropriate.  Once you’ve got walking and running down, you can start to combine them and figure out new ways of doing so.

Not everyone will agree with my choice of rule-breaking, and not everyone will agree with yours.  But if you know what you’re doing, you’ll know when you can get away with what.  I’m careful to be consistent with my usage of split infinitives, so it should be obvious that I’m being deliberate.  And I am fully aware that I’ve probably made at least one grammatical error in this essay.  Typos are one thing; we all make them at some point.  What I’m trying to get across is that you have to have the basic skills. Editors are there to help catch the typos.

The second most important thing for any writer is to be a reader.  You cannot be too widely-read.  Read everything you can, from every genre, in every format.  Even if you don’t like it, read at least some of it.  There’s a reason certain books are considered classics.  If you want to know why, you have to read them.  Cliff’s Notes may get you through high school, but they won’t get you published.  This is one area where book-knowledge is the same as real-world knowledge.  READ.

After you’ve read as many different types and styles and authors as you can stand, feel free to pick some favorites and re-read them.  I tend to get lost in the stories, and it’s work to make myself pay attention to what the author is doing to make the book so fabulous.  But after the fifteenth read, I can get a sense of what she or he is doing from the technical aspect.  And then I work to incorporate that technical awesomeness into my own word crafting.

One technical thing that I’ve learned is to vary words and length.  Don’t use the same word or phrase in the same paragraph unless it’s vital.  Whatever scene you’re writing, odds are highly in favor that there are at least three different words to express the major point.  Find them.  Use them.  But don’t abuse them.

Also, I try to make my sentences different lengths.  In days of yore, run-on sentences were the norm and expected of writers.  Today’s audiences, even the most erudite, get lost and bored in long, heavy sentences.  Sometimes, it’s needful to have a long sentence to express a plot point or to finish out a scene, and occasionally extra words are required to fully convey a concept to the audience that you feel they really need to know, but most of the time, you can split the sentence up at the commas, throw in a few extra conjunctions or transitions, and the audience will never realize (or care) that you didn’t use as many words as Dickens at his greatest.

This next suggestion is purely a personal preference of mine and may be taken however you like.  Don’t use passive voice.  I hate the use of passive voice.  Loathe it.  Yes, yes, occasionally passive voice is necessary (and I’ve used it in this post).  However, the vast majority of the time it is not.  It’s the difference between show and tell.  The best writers show the audience, they don’t tell them.  Give your audience the tools to build the scene in their own minds, and they will love you.  Dictate to them, and they will go elsewhere.

For example: “Jack and Jill are walking up the hill.”  Compare that to “Jack and Jill walked up the hill.”  Say it out loud a couple of times and think about it.  Using an active verb gives you a stronger sentence.  Your characters do things, move with a purpose that the reader can readily pick up on.  Unless the story or character requires it, don’t use passive voice.

I don’t know to whom to attribute this quote, but I’m told that there are “nine and twenty ways to write the aboriginal lays.”  That means that every single author has her or his own method of generating output, and the best way is the one that works for you.  I’m going to share a bit of my process, and you are most welcome to use or adapt or ignore it.

I find that I need to live with characters and stories for a while before I can write them.  Usually, I need at least a year to really get to know them and understand what’s going on.  There are exceptions, but those are usually my short stories, which don’t require as much inter-weaving of plot points due to their length.  My novels I need a good long while to figure out.

Once I’ve had a story in my head for long enough, I know what the major scenes are, the big plot points.  Far too often, I wind up replaying those scenes in my head over and over, as though they were the entirety of the story.  Yet once I have those big pieces, I can start connecting them with smaller scenes and developments.

When I plot, I jot down the big scenes first, the ones I’ve imagined over and over; then, I notate the important things that have to happen in those scenes.  Next, I organize them into something resembling sense and base my chapters on that.

I have to allow myself a lot of flexibility when I write; using a strict outline has nearly killed more than one of my stories.  I can only outline so far before I have to sit back and trust my subconscious.  I do have tentative outlines for each chapter, but I’ve had to split some into two, and some I’ve been able to combine.  And, of course, I completely rearrange some sections on the fly.

Another part to being flexible while writing is in letting the story tell itself.  That’s been very hard for me to learn and accept.  Sometimes, the plot goes a completely different direction than you thought it would.  Very often, the characters come up with things you never expected.

Writing is interesting and slightly bizarre because the stories and characters are 100% your own doing, 100% part of you.  You are the one coming up with all of this; it’s your mind creating these twists and turns.  And yet, every writer will tell you that the stories and characters live on their own.  It’s as though there’s a separate part of your mind, a section of your brain, that’s set aside for them.  Writers are occasionally allowed visiting rights, but they don’t live there.

And we have to be ok with that; we have to allow that to happen.  I’ve had characters change as I wrote them, scenes morph into something I honestly didn’t want.  I fought those changes tooth and nail, and all I got was a headache and the desire to throw the laptop across the room.  “Why is this so hard?” I would wail.  It’s hard because I wouldn’t let it do what it needed to do.  It’s a lot like raising kids; eventually, you have to let them go their own way.  Forcing your will on them only creates animosity and separation.

So, there’s a high-level overview of my writing tips and tricks.

One: Know grammar.  If you constantly struggle with this, it’s ok to have a proof-reader or editor.  Please, for the sake of those who would be your readers, get whatever help you need.  We want to read your stuff, and you don’t want to let something so basic keep us away.

Two: Read.  Know what you like and what you don’t like.  Know why.  Then either do or don’t do those things in your own writing.  Three: Mix it up.  Engage not just our imaginations but our minds, as well.  Four: Figure out your technique.  This will change over time as you do; the more you write, the more you’ll refine and reshape your process.  Five: Trust yourself.  Write what needs to be written, not what you think needs to be written.  And remember, you can always go back and fix it later.  In fact, you’d better go back and fix it; the first draft is never worth publishing.  Unless you’re Mozart, but that’s another rant.

The last bit of wisdom (if I may be so vain) to impart to you is: Have fun!  The reason you write is because you enjoy it.  Something about the process or product gives you satisfaction; savor that.  Maybe you enjoy the grind of putting yourself in the chair and cranking out words.  Maybe it’s the comments you get from fans that you crave.  Perhaps all you need is to see your name on the Best Sellers’ List.  Whatever it is that you love about telling stories, don’t lose sight of that.  Wipe the sweat from your brow, stretch out the back, and keep a hot cuppa handy.

You’ve got what it takes to be a writer.  Make the most of it!

__

Thanks for that Sharon. You can find Sharon’s weblit fiction at her website Lilyfields Entertainment.

Posted in Guest Post | Leave a comment

Brief musings on the history of Online Fiction

A while back there was a  thread on weblit.us about why Web Comics are so successful compared to Weblit.

One of the things that came up was the idea that web comics have been around longer than online fiction. This simply isn’t true as Kira from Epiguide quickly pointed out. Then I weighed in with my comments. This post is developed from those comments.

I’ve been reading good, original non-porn fiction on the Internet since I discovered the Internet.

And how long ago was that? Well, let’s just say I remember looking over a friend’s shoulder and seeing this new-fangled thing called “Mosaic” on the screen, and asking what it was. I remember tearing my hair out trying to install winsock on my pc so I could access this web thing via my internet connection. I also remember a load of geek friends being absolutely certain gopher would win out against this new web thingy *giggles*. I was on the internet before the web (just).

I’ve been thinking about this and I’ve come to a conclusion.

It’s not that we’re new at this per se. As I said there’s always been original fiction on the net. It’s that the web offers us few of the advantages the comic artists found here. Sure we can pretty things up and it’s easier to monetise in theory, but in one important respect we’re actually at a disadvantage to where we were before.

Let me explain.

Back then I used to find original fiction on email discussion lists, bulletin boards and usenet groups – you know those places we used to network before someone invented social networking.

What this meant was the original fiction was being posted where the target readers already were. This paid dividends in interactivity with with the readers. Since they were already predisposed to your chosen genre they’d comment if it was any good.

Conclusion: Plenty of people are perfectly happy to read on a screen. So the ‘people don’t read on computers’ argument is incorrect.

Then the web appeared and took over. But once everything moved onto the web writers suddenly had to attract readers to their fiction instead of taking it to them. That’s a whole different ballgame.

Now there were people posting comics on UseNet, but prior to the web it was a bit of a pain to read them. The web made handling graphics easier. So while they had the same issue of having to attract readers to a site now, the fact that it removed an inconvenient step from the online comic viewing process made the migration easier.

Still the mid-nineties were a sort of heyday for online fiction. The moment people started making websites some people started putting their stories online. I remember reading quite a bit of it.

The first real attempt to monetize it came with “The Spot” in 1995. I actually never read it and everything I say about it here comes with the caveat that it’s based on what I’ve heard from friends and what I’ve read on Wikipedia.

According to its creator at its height it got 100,000 hits a day. Extrordinarily massive at the time. Indeed most weblit authors would be beyond ecstatic with a fraction of those hits today.

The Spot wasn’t financially a success. But before you use it as evidence that weblit monetization is improbable there’s something you need to remember. Monetization was in its youth then and it did pioneer at least one of the methods webcomics now use to support themselves. Advertising banners.

The 1990s brought many more of these “Web Soaps” and I hope to have a guest post in  the near future who can talk more about this section of our history, since I was never really into it.

But this is the thing: 100k hits a day proves that online fiction can draw in large numbers of readers, and it begs the question we all keep asking ourselves.

“Where are the readers, and how do we get them from there to our stuff?”

As far as I can tell the Spot – and I may be wrong, if so please correct me – was so successful because its initial success caught the attention of the media and created a phenomenon. And of course soaps are popular and it had corporate backing.

It would take something extraordinary to do that nowadays, but at least we know readers are potentially out there.

And here’s some other figures. Online original fiction archive Fictionpress.com gets in excess of 20k unique visitors/250k page views a day according to its Adbrite page. That’s a whole lot of readers.

So readers are out there. The trick is getting them to our sites.

This is the problem. Not “people don’t read online”. Not “there aren’t enough interested readers”, but “our potential audience doesn’t even know about us”.

This is why advertising on those webcomics which are online graphic novels is one of the few methods of attracting readers which is proven to work. It’s the one source of readers with a reasonable conversion rate which is within reach of our budgets. Sites like fictionpress would probably also yield decent numbers but are way too expensive for most (if not all) of us.

The good news is that I truly believe this is not an insoluble problem.

The bad news is we haven’t solved it yet.

Or perhaps I’m just a hopeless optimist.

Erm, well, that kind of ended up being different to what I envisioned when I started this post. Hopefully it was interesting.

Posted in weblit musings | 2 Comments

Weblit Review: The Witches of Greenwitch

The Witches of Greenwitch

A mysterious stone magics book-rat Melissa to the world of Greenwitch where she meets fairy tale creatures that are not at all what she expected.  Desperately, she looks for a way home and tries to ignore her past which pops up at the most inappropriate moments.  At the same time, dangerous pursuers are at her heels getting closer by the minute.

The Witches of Greenwitch is an illustrated fantasy novel written by Katharina Gerlach and illustrated by Eszter Bohus. It is currently at 20 chapters and according to the website the novel has 52 chapters in all. The story is being posted simultaneously in English and German. This review deals only with the English version as I don’t know much German.

Likes:

  1. It probably won’t surprise anyone that I’m a big fan of the fish out of water sub-genre of traditional fantasy. So the premise gets a big thumbs up.
  2. The “cover” and the illustrations are beautiful.
  3. The worldbuilding and backstory is well thought out.
  4. The main character is a typical selfish sullen teen, but basically a good kid with a core of inner strength and compassion that bodes well for her development.
  5. Both the antagonists have decent motivations. I like that.

Dislikes:

  1. The prose is sometimes a bit dry and the phrasing at times a little odd. I suspect both these flaws are down to English not being the author’s first language. This isn’t to say it’s bad just not the phrasing a native speaker would use, so it reads a little off.
  2. While the antagonists are well developed I felt that the way the motivations of one of them was revealed through exposition of his thoughts was less than ideal and could have been done better.
  3. The art may be gorgeous as I said above but the design of the site in general is kind of bland.

Verdict:

The Witches of Greenwitch is a good read even given its flaws. If you like the fish out of water genre it’s definately worth a try.

Posted in weblit reviews | 1 Comment